Legal Opinion

Renwick v. Noggle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 32, Calendar No. 34,249PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is an action of ejectment, involving a boundary dispute. Defendants had verdict of a jury and judgment.

Plaintiffs purchased in 1922, defendants in 1914. Suit was commenced in 1927. Defendants ’ land adjoined plaintiffs’ on the north. Practically without dispute, the testimony was that by means of an old fence on the east side, 10 to 15 rods long, a fence row, hedge row, some trees and shrubbery, a definite line between the premises was established; that for 20 to 25 years the parties and their predecessors in title had cultivated, worked, pastured, and used' their respective premises to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. Ten HoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Bringhurst v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thomas v. HarlanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gregory v. ThorrezMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Johnson v. SquiresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Jackson v. DeemarMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Siegel v. Renkiewicz EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API