Malim v. Benthien
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered July 7, 1920, dismissing an action upon sustaining a demurrer to a complaint for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
— Hylebos Creek Diking District was duly organized under the diking and drainage act of 1895, and its boundaries fixed at the time of such organization. Under the amendatory act of 1913, Laws of 1913, p. 267; Rem. Code, § 4107, the respondents, as the board of commissioners of the district, instituted proceedings in the superior court for Pierce county, setting up that lands without the district as originally established-were being benefited by the diking system *534which had been installed, and sought to have the lands in such extended area outside of the original district assessed for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- People Ex Rel. Bolton v. . AlbertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Durkee v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- State v. GarbroskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- King County Water District No. 54 v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Carstens v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Foster v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.