Legal Opinion
King County Water District No. 54 v. King County Boundary Review Board
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1976No. 44043PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Acting pursuant to RCW 35.13A, the City of Des Moines took steps to assume the jurisdiction, facilities, and assets of King County Water District No. 54. The proposed assumption was submitted to the King County Boundary Review Board, as required by RCW 36.93, and the board approved the proposal. The board’s decision was in turn appealed to the Superior Court by the water district and residents of the district. District No. 54 sought reversal on the grounds that the Boundary Review Board violated the appearance of fairness doctrine and failed to comply with certain provisions of RCW 36.93.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Save a Valuable Environment v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.