State v. Garbroski
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaska District Court'. — Hon. D. Kyan, Judge. The defendant'was accused and convicted of peddling-in the county, outside of a city or incorporated town, without a license from the auditor, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The evidence tended to- show that defendant peddled goods in Mahaska county, outside of any city or town, without first having obtained a license from the county auditor so to do-. He asserts that, even though the evidence may have warranted his conviction, the statute under which the prosecution was had is in contravention of the constitution of the state. Section 1347 of the Code reads: “Peddlers plying their vocation outside of a city or town shall pay for the use of the county an annual tax of ten dollars; those with a vehicle drawn by one animal, twenty-five dollars; those with four or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Hubbell v. HigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Commonwealth v. HanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Shaw v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.