Legal Opinion
Hage v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 8, 1996No. 91-1470 LPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, E. Wayne and Jean N. Hage, are ranch owners in Nye County, Nevada. In this suit they allege constitutional, contractual and statutory causes of action. First, plaintiffs claim that the defendant took compensable property interests in their grazing permit, water rights, ditch rights-of-way, rangeland forage, cattle and ranch. Second, the plaintiffs claim that their grazing permit is a contract which the defendant has breached, entitling them to damages. Third, plaintiffs claim entitlement to compensation for improvements they have made to the public…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- The Estate of Wayne Hage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Chevy Chase Land Co. of Montgomery County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Walker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.