Legal Opinion
The Estate of Wayne Hage v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 26, 2012No. 2011-5001, 2011-5013PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
E. Wayne Hage and Jean Hage brought an action against the United States, seeking compensation for a Fifth Amendment taking of private property, breach of contract, and range improvements pursuant to 43 U.S.C. § 1752(g). The Court of Federal Claims (Claims Court) awarded compensation for the taking of water rights plus interest from the date of the taking. The Claims Court also awarded compensation for range improvements, but did not award any corresponding pre-judgment interest. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm-in-part, reverse-in-part, vacate-in-part, and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Casitas Municipal Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Barlow & Haun, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- McGuire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- National Food & Beverage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.