Legal Opinion

Investment Co. Institute v. Hatch

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 26, 1991No. C4-91-904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant contends that the statutory registration fee scheme embodied in Minn. Stat. § 80A.28, subd. 1(b) (1990) violates both the due process and the equal protection clauses of the United States Constitution. We affirm the trial court’s summary judgment that the statutory language and legislative history sufficiently support the use of Minn.Stat. § 80A.28, subd. 1(b) to raise revenues.

FACTS

Subdivision 1(b) of section 80A.28 provides for the collection of fees from the registration of redeemable securities. 1 The statute provides for a fee calculated as a percentage of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. Munoz-FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Texas Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haage v. SteiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Masters v. Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Pomrenke v. Commissioner of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API