Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Haage v. Steies

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 1996No. C3-96-749PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judgg.

The district court denied Greg Haage standing to sue for return of commissions under Minn.Stat. §§ 184A.01-.20 (1992). Haage appeals, asserting that chapter 184A provides a musician a private right of action against an unlicensed entertainment agent. Because the statutes neither explicitly nor impliedly create a private right of action for failure to obtain a license, we affirm the dismissal for lack of standing.

FACTS

Greg Haage is a band leader and professional musician. Haage sued his entertainment agent, Bo Bogotty, and a club owner for breach of contract, overpayment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Larson v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Lorshbough v. Township of BuzzleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Bruegger v. Faribault County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Petra Brokken v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  2. Summers v. R & D AGENCY, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Buck v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Kelley v. Opportunity Finance, LLC (In re Petters Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  5. Buck v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API