United States v. Munoz-Flores
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
This case raises the question whether 18 U. S. C. § 3013, which requires courts to impose a monetary “special assessment” on any person convicted of a federal misdemeanor, was passed in violation of the Origination Clause of the Constitution. That Clause mandates that “[a]ll Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.” U. S. Const., Art. I, § 7, cl. 1. We conclude initially that this case does not present a political question and therefore reject the Government’s argument that the case is not justiciable. On the merits, we hold that the special assessment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Paul Retfalvi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.