Legal Opinion

United States v. Munoz-Flores

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1990No. 88-1932PublishedCited by 178 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

This case raises the question whether 18 U. S. C. § 3013, which requires courts to impose a monetary “special assessment” on any person convicted of a federal misdemeanor, was passed in violation of the Origination Clause of the Constitution. That Clause mandates that “[a]ll Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.” U. S. Const., Art. I, § 7, cl. 1. We conclude initially that this case does not present a political question and therefore reject the Government’s argument that the case is not justiciable. On the merits, we hold that the special assessment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by178 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  3. Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Paul Retfalvi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API