Loftsgaarden v. Reiling
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court.
In a libel action the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff assessing actual damages as “$0” and punitive damages at $5,000 after the court had ruled that the publication was libelous per se. Defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted and judgment was directed in favor of defendant. Although we have not been provided with a settled case, it is clear that the order of the trial court must have been based on the ground that in a libel per se action 1 punitive damages are not recoverable in the absence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Clark v. McClurgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Rickbeil v. Grafton Deaconess HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Reynolds v. PeglerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Gambrill v. SchooleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Anderson v. KammeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.