Legal Opinion

Abbott v. LaCourse

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 30, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] Roland LaCourse appeals from a judgment entered in the District Court (Springvale, Janelle, J.) granting Lois M. and Arthur R. Abbott’s motion for a summary judgment in their foreclosure action. LaCourse argues, inter alia, that there is a genuine issue of material fact in dispute. Because we agree, we vacate the judgment. 1

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The following facts are not in dispute. In November 1983, LaCourse executed a note in favor of the Abbotts for $8000, payable in thirty-six monthly installments, with interest at 15%. The final payment was due in November 1986. LaCourse secured the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burdzel v. SobusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Kandlis v. HuotariSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. MP ASSOCIATES v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Emerson v. SweetSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Mann v. Homestead Realty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chase Home Finance LLC v. HigginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  2. Hutz v. AldenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Maravell v. R.J. Grondin & SonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. In Re Estate of McPheeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API