Kandlis v. Huotari
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DANA, Justice.
Hanya Kandlis appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Perkins, A.R.J.) in favor of Carol and Robert Huotari, Dorothy and Edward Luck, Shelly and Robert Cross, and Leo Deegan on Kandlis’s claim for contribution. Kandlis argues that the court erred in holding that she had either expressly or impliedly waived her right to contribution. We agree and vacate the judgment.
In 1987 Keiser Homes of Maine, Inc., sought financing from Oxford Bank and Trust. As a condition of the loan Oxford required that all the shareholders of Keiser and their spouses…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Banville v. HuckinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Fitzgerald v. GamesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- United States v. Julius C. Immordino and Joanne Immordino, and Third-Party v. Joseph C. Costa, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Tondreau v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Don L. Tullis & Associates, Inc. v. GoverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Crowe v. BolducCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- MP ASSOCIATES v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Farrington's Owners' Ass'n v. Conway Lake Resorts, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Spottiswoode v. LevineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- York Ins. Group of Maine v. Van HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.