Legal Opinion
Burdzel v. Sobus
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 12, 2000PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Klemens Burdzel Jr., (Klemens) appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Hjelm, J.) granting defendants Emily Sobus and Raymond Burd-zel’s (Emily and Raymond’s) motion for summary judgment against Klemens’s claim for tortious interference with an expectancy. Klemens argues that the court erred' in ruling that this claim is barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND 1
[¶ 2] Klemens, Emily, and Raymond are all children of Klemens Burdzel Sr., (the decedent) who died in September, 1992. Klemens has resided outside of the State for several years. Emily…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- CRY v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Barnes v. ZappiaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Carroll v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Prescott v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Sacre v. Victor L. Sacre People's Savings BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Flaherty v. MutherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Currie v. Industrial Security, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Levine v. R.B.K. Caly Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Francis v. StinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Lever v. Acadia Hospital Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.