Legal Opinion

Pacific Engineering & Production Company of Nevada v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporation and Kerr-Mcgee Chemical Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1977No. 76-1238PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge.

This is an antitrust action brought by Pacific Engineering & Production Company of Nevada (PE) against Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation (successor to American Potash and Chemical Co., which shall be referred to as AMPOT) and its parent corporation, Kerr-McGee Corporation. The trial court gave PE judgment for treble damages totaling $4,590,594 and for attorneys’ fees of $528,000 based on its finding that AMPOT was guilty of monopolizing and attempting to monopolize in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and of price discrimination in violation of § 2(a) of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. Container Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Northeastern Telephone Company v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  5. Barry Wright Corporation v. Itt Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API