Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 20, 1960No. 389PublishedCited by 188 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren
The question presented is whether certain pricing activities of respondent, Anheuser-Busch, Inc., constituted price discrimination within the meaning of § 2 (a) of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U. S. C. § 13 (a).
Section 2 (a) provides in pertinent part:
“That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchases involved in such…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Pressure Vessels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Empire GasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.