Legal Opinion
Barry Wright Corporation v. Itt Grinnell Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 29, 1983No. 83-1292PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, Circuit Judge.
The question that this case presents is whether defendant Pacific Scientific Company (“Pacific”) engaged in “exclusionary practices” in violation of the anti-monopoly law, Sherman Act § 2, 15 U.S.C. § 2. The practices at issue are embodied in agreements between Pacific and ITT Grinnell (“Grinnell”), under which Pacific agreed to sell its product (mechanical snubbers) to Grinnell at a specially low price and Grin-nell agreed to take nearly all its snubber requirements from Pacific. The district court, 555 F.Supp. 1264, found that the relevant contract provisions did not…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Pressure Vessels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Empire GasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- ZF Meritor LLC v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.