Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 1, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Kurt Reeder (Claimant) petitions for review of the September 13, 2004, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) that affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) granting the modification/review petition filed by Mercer Lime and Stone Company (Employer). We affirm.

Claimant suffered a work-related injury to his face and right eye on April 2, 1998, when a machine hose exploded in his face. Claimant filed a claim petition against Employer, and Claimant also filed a civil action against the manufacturer of the machine and the manufacturer of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. PEC Contracting Engineers v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Mrkich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Deak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Coker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Smith v. Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Fortwangler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Monessen, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. L. Gladziszewski v. WCAB (PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API