Ward v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
William Ward (Claimant) contends a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) erred by denying his petition to reinstate total disability benefits. Specifically, Claimant asserts the record does not support the finding he failed to prove his physical condition deteriorated to the degree he is no longer capable of performing work previously found to be within his physical restrictions. The WCJ’s finding, Claimant also urges, constitutes a capricious disregard of competent evidence. Upon review, we affirm.
Claimant worked for the City of Philadelphia (Employer) as a fire fighter.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Arena v. Packaging Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Protz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Furnari v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Hawbaker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Roundtree v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Thomas Lindstrom Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.