Legal Opinion

Steel Products Co. of Oregon, Inc. v. FMD Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1978No. 418-360, SC 25047PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Plaintiff brought this action at law to recover a deposit of $5,000 paid to defendant in conjunction with an oral agreement for the sale of land. Plaintiff contends that it gave defendant the $5,000 check to be held until a formal written agreement for the purchase of land was consented to by all contracting parties. Defendant, on the other hand, contends that the $5,000 was given as a part payment on an already finalized parol agreement to sell land, and further contends that by reason of plaintiffs breach of the parol agreement, defendant is entitled to retain the $5,000 and to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reed v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Martin Engineering Co., Inc. v. OptonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kretz Et Ux v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Brady Et Ux v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Clinton v. ThornhillOregon Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boers v. Payline Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. In re the Marriage of GrageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Waverly Construction Co. v. Gold Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Barman v. Union Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. D. M. Development Co. v. OsburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API