Legal Opinion

Clinton v. Thornhill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1977No. TC 89814, SC 24819PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident. The case was tried before a jury which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $15,000. Defendants appeal from the resulting judgment. We affirm.

Defendants’ first assignment of error is that the trial court erred in allowing plaintiff to amend her complaint at the conclusion of the testimony so as to conform to the proof by adding an allegation that her earning capacity had been impaired. Defendants say that this amendment came too late and resulted in prejudice to defendant Thornhill.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Engelcke v. StoehslerOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Martin Engineering Co., Inc. v. OptonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Tavenner v. FiginiOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steel Products Co. of Oregon, Inc. v. FMD Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Franz v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API