Legal Opinion

Kretz Et Ux v. Howard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRedding, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is, a suit for specific performance of an oral contract for the sale of real and personal property, brought by Russell P. Kretz and Bertsie M. Kretz, husband and wife, as plaintiffs, against J. Francyl Howard and Mary Howard, his wife, and their two children, Maryan Howard and James Howard. Decree was entered in favor of defendants and plaintiffs appeal.

The plaintiffs contend that the defendants agreed to sell them the following described real and personal property, to-wit:

“That part of the Thomas Monteith D.L.C. Claim No. 64, in T. 11 S., R. 3 West of the-Willamette.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Le Vee v. Le VeeOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Reed v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Killgreen v. Western Loan & Building Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Friesen v. FuitenOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Strong v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Pacificorp v. Lakeview Power Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Cook v. the MV WasaborgDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  5. Steel Products Co. of Oregon, Inc. v. FMD Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API