Legal Opinion

D. M. Development Co. v. Osburn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1980No. A7712-17290, CA 14411PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendants appeal from a decree of specific performance which compels them to sell business property to plaintiff on terms specified in a lease agreement. Defendants assign as error the following:

1) Failure to hold that plaintiff was in default on the lease and thus had no right to enforce any provision thereof;

2) Failure to hold that the terms of the lease were superseded by a settlement agreement which was either authorized by plaintiff or subsequently ratified;

3) Holding that the $45,000 purchase price specified in the lease was subject to an offset of $4,900 for payments received from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bembridge v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Carey v. HaysOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Garrison v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Northern Brewery Co. v. Princess HotelOregon Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Agricultural Aviation Engineering Co. v. Board of Clark County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API