D. M. Development Co. v. Osburn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendants appeal from a decree of specific performance which compels them to sell business property to plaintiff on terms specified in a lease agreement. Defendants assign as error the following:
1) Failure to hold that plaintiff was in default on the lease and thus had no right to enforce any provision thereof;
2) Failure to hold that the terms of the lease were superseded by a settlement agreement which was either authorized by plaintiff or subsequently ratified;
3) Holding that the $45,000 purchase price specified in the lease was subject to an offset of $4,900 for payments received from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North Pacific Lumber Co. v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Bembridge v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Carey v. HaysOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Garrison v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Northern Brewery Co. v. Princess HotelOregon Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Agricultural Aviation Engineering Co. v. Board of Clark County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1990