Legal Opinion

McGrath v. Herzog

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1936No. Appeal, 340PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the testimony established a causal connection between the accident and the death of the claimant’s husband. The referee and the board found for the claimant, but on appeal the court of common pleas sustained the exceptions and entered judgment for the defendant, from which the claimant has appealed.

On June 13, 1933 Anderson McGrath, claimant’s husband, whose regular employment was mixing concrete, was helping another employee to lift large curbstones over his head into a large truck. While so engaged, he suffered an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Anderson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Hein v. LudwigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Berlin v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Giallonardo v. St. Joseph's CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Gibson v. Blowers Paint ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Easton v. Elk Tanning Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Wheeler v. National Nayle Grip Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Joner v. Made-Rite Paper Box Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API