Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Halkovics

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1982No. 81-1903PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

A court may properly grant a motion for a directed verdict *186where, after construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion is directed, it finds that upon any determinative issue reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion upon the evidence submitted and that conclusion is adverse to such party. Civ. R. 50(A)(4). If, however, there is substantial competent evidence to support the party against whom the motion is made, upon which evidence reasonable minds might reach different conclusions, the motion must be denied. Kellerman v. J. S. Durig Co. (1964),…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. McMahon v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Patton v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Brinkmoeller v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Limited Stores, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Brads v. First Baptist ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. McKinney v. SchlatterOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. McLeod v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API