Legal Opinion

Patton v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1939No. 27388PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The principal error claimed by the defendant, appellant herein, is that the trial court erred in overruling its motions for a directed verdict and its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The only question of importance to be determined is whether, under the circumstances, plaintiff’s decedent was guilty of contributory negligence, as a'matter of law, in attempting to pass over the railroad crossing in question, and, if so, was his negligence in so doing the proximate cause of his death.

Since there were no eyewitnesses to the actual collision which resulted in the death of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd. Co. v. RohrsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. RusynikOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Toledo Term. Rd. Co. v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. North v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Woodworth v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Crawford v. HalkovicsOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. DETROIT, T. & IR CO. v. YeleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API