Legal Opinion

Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. Haliburton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1974No. 7422SC175PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Whether good cause exists to set aside an entry of default pursuant to Rule 55 (d) is a matter addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, Acceptance Corp. v. Samuels, 11 N.C. App. 504, 181 S.E. 2d 794, and its ruling will not be disturbed unless a clear abuse of discretion is shown, Hubbard v. Lumley, 17 N.C. App. 649, 195 S.E. 2d 330. On the facts of this case, no abuse of discretion has been shown.

The affidavits presented by defendant Bottling Co. in support of its motion indicated that plaintiffs’ summons and complaint were served upon Donald L. McCollum,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whaley v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. North American Acceptance Corp. v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Hubbard v. LumleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Granville Medical Center v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Peebles v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Byrd v. MortensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Luke v. Omega Consulting Group, LCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. v. Key Way Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API