Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Lumley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1973No. 7321SC154PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Plaintiff asserts that the trial judge abused his discretion in setting aside and vacating entry of default against defendant Hubbard.

When an entry of default has been made by the Clerk of Superior Court, a motion to set aside and vacate that entry is governed by the provisions of Rule 55(d) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure which provide as follows:

“ (d) Setting aside default. — For good cause shown the court may set aside an entry of default, and, if a judgment by default has been entered, the judge may set it aside in accordance with Rule 60(b).” (Emphasis added.)

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whaley v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Crotts v. Camel Pawn Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peebles v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Sykes v. Keiltex Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Bailey v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. HaliburtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API