Legal Opinion
United States v. Reyes
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 11, 1995No. 94 CR 872 (SAS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Defendant Jose Reyes (“Reyes”) moves to bar the Government from applying for subpoenas duces tecum returnable prior to trial on an ex parte basis. For the reasons set forth below, Reyes’ motion is denied.
DISCUSSION
A grand jury in the Southern District of New York originally indicted Reyes on November 16, 1994. The grand jury issued a superseding indictment against Reyes on December 19, 1994 and a second superseding indictment on January 25, 1995. This latter thirty-two count indictment charges defendants with narcotics trafficking, murder, assault,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Francis J. Langford, Individually and as Natural Guardian of Frank P. Langford, an Infant v. Chrysler Motors Corp., and Woodbridge Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Gordon UrlacherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. UrlacherDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. NachamieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- United States v. TomisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1997
- United States v. BeckfordDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- Commonwealth v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- United States v. TuckerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.