Legal Opinion
United States v. Nachamie
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 2000No. S2 98 CR. 1238(SAS)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Cr. P. 17(c), defendant Jose Hernandez has served twenty-four subpoenas duces tecum on non-parties in this prosecution of eight defendants for Medicare fraud. 1 The Government has moved to quash all of the subpoenas, and Hernandez opposes the Government’s motion. 2
I. BACKGROUND
A. The Indictment
The Indictment contains a total of twenty-six counts which are briefly summarized below. Count One alleges that all eight defendants conspired, between 1995 and June 10,1998, to violate certain laws of the United States, to wit: Sections…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Alex J. RaineriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. IoziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Washington v. Thurgood Marshall AcademyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- United States v. NachamieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- State v. HarrisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Stevenson v. Stanley Bostitch, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.