Legal Opinion

United States v. Tucker

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 7, 2008No. 05 Cr. 711(SAS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

1. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Von Tucker has requested that this Court authorize a subpoena ordering the Bureau of Prisons to produce all recordings of telephone conversations involving each of the cooperating witnesses. The government has moved to quash the subpoena. For the reasons stated below, Tucker’s request is granted, the subpoena is issued with certain modifications, and the government’s motion is denied.1

II. BACKGROUND2

The government has stated its intention to call three cooperating witnesses to testify against Tucker. In connection…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. United States v. ApodacaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. HouseKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. United States v. Binh Tang VoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. United States v. FernandesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API