Legal Opinion
United States v. Tomison
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 30, 1997No. CR. S-96-427 LKKPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.
The defendants in the above-captioned case sought subpoenas duces tecum directed to various third parties requiring the pretrial production of documents pertaining to their defense. Claiming that Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(c) authorized the procedure, their motion was made ex-parte and sought the sealing of the motion and the supporting documents asserting that serving those documents upon the government would reveal their likely strategy at trial. The Court granted the motions to seal and authorized issuance of the subpoenas. Now Pending before the court are motions…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. KravetzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. NachamieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- United States v. Jeremy StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Thomas v. Marina AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Donahoo v. Ohio Dept. of Youth ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.