Legal Opinion

In Re E.L. McCapes

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1909No. Crim. No. 1526PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Sheriff of Madera County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Petitioner was charged with and con victed of a violation of subdivision 3 of section 384 of the Penal Code. That section declares it to be a misdemeanor if any person shall willfully or negligently build “a fire on his own land for the purpose of burning brush, stumps, logs, rubbish, fallen timber, fallows, grass or any other thing whatsoever, . . . provided, that any state or district fire warden may in his reasonable discretion give a written permit to any person desiring to build fires,” etc. He earnestly contends, that the section under which" he is charged is unreasonable and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ex parte WhitwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ex Parte DrexelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. In Re KelsoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Ex Parte DickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frost v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Paiva v. California Door Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Mattei v. HeckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. People v. GoodspeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API