People v. Bouzas
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUCAS, C.J.
—We granted review to resolve a split of authority in the Courts of Appeal concerning whether a defendant charged under Penal Code section 666 (petty theft with a prior theft-related conviction) 1 may stipulate to a prior felony conviction allegation and thus preclude the jury from learning of that conviction. We conclude a defendant may so stipulate.
I. Facts and Procedure
Lee, a pharmacist at a Thrifty Drug Store, and Romero, a clerk in the pharmacy department, noticed defendant standing near the store’s pharmacy area for an unusual amount of time. Finally, they saw…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Wilkoff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.