Legal Opinion

People v. Bouzas

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1991No. S017682PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C.J.

—We granted review to resolve a split of authority in the Courts of Appeal concerning whether a defendant charged under Penal Code section 666 (petty theft with a prior theft-related conviction) 1 may stipulate to a prior felony conviction allegation and thus preclude the jury from learning of that conviction. We conclude a defendant may so stipulate.

I. Facts and Procedure

Lee, a pharmacist at a Thrifty Drug Store, and Romero, a clerk in the pharmacy department, noticed defendant standing near the store’s pharmacy area for an unusual amount of time. Finally, they saw…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wilkoff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API