Legal Opinion

Glaze v. Metcalf Thresher Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1917No. 6796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from County Court, Alfalfa County : F. M. Gustin, Judge. Suit by the Metcalf Thresher Company against Samuel Glaze. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

The Metcalf Thresher Company, a copartnership, sued Samuel Glaze to recover a certain amount alleged to be due for threshing certain wheat grown upon the premises of defendant for the season of 1911 and 1912. Defendant filed demurrer to the amended bill of particulars, which was overruled, exceptions reserved, and the case afterwards -tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff.

The action of the court in overruling the demurrer is urged as error. In answer to this assignment, plaintiff says that, because the ruling thereon was had more than six months prior to the filing of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LoftisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Love v. CavettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Clinton Cemetery Ass'n v. McAtteeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Wilson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Bower-Venus Grain Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Hugo State Bank v. Hugo Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Mohrman v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API