St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Loftis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from 'District Court, Marshall County; D. A. Richardson, • Judge. Action by H. L. Loftis against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Citing: Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Woodward (Ind. Ter.) 35 S. W. 240; St. Louis é S. F. R. Co. v. Zachary, 53 S. W. 327; Chicago, R. I. '& P. Ry. Co. v. Huggins, 69 S. W. 846. — Citing: Cain v. GoldMt.
Read the full summary
Error from 'District Court, Marshall County; D. A. Richardson, • Judge. Action by H. L. Loftis against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Citing: Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Woodward (Ind. Ter.) 35 S. W. 240; St. Louis é S. F. R. Co. v. Zachary, 53 S. W. 327; Chicago, R. I. '& P. Ry. Co. v. Huggins, 69 S. W. 846. — Citing: Cain v. GoldMt. Mining Co. (Mont.) 71 Pac. 1004 ; Slmendorf v. Golden (Wash.) 80 Pac. 264; Power v. Slocking, 68 Pac. 859; Columbia & P. S. R. Co. v. Hawthorne. 144 U. S. 202; Gulf, C. & 8. F. Ry. Co. v.…
1Opinion of the CourtIIaxes, J.
This action was commenced by H. L. Loftis, hereinafter called plaintiff, against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, hereinafter called the Railroad Company, in September, 1907, in the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory at Tishomingo, where it was pending at the time of the admission of the state. After the admission of the state, it was transferred to the district court of Marshall county, where a trial resulted in a judgment for plaintiff. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for two mules which he alleges were killed by the Railroad Company…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
- Weber v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. DoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Simpson v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Cain v. Gold Mountain Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. BluntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. CauthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Pine Belt Lumber Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Dickinson v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.