Legal Opinion

Nystrand v. O'MALLEY

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1962No. 36144PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

Andrew Nystrand and his wife and George O’Malley and his wife are neighbors, residing on adjoin ing lots 9 and 10 respectively, in Block 20, Lake Shore View Addition to the city of Seattle. Their properties are bordered on the east by Lake Washington and on the west by a 12-foot strip of land which is dedicated as a street, but unopened for travel, unimproved and unusable as a street in the area abutting the parties’ properties. To the west of and parallel to this 12-foot street is a right of way of the Northern Pacific Railroad upon which is located a well-defined roadway regularly used by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gifford v. HortonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. James v. BurchettWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Simons v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hinz v. LieserWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Zarelli v. Superior Distributing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Birchler v. Castello Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Puget Sound Alumni of Kappa Sigma, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Union Bank v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  5. Caffrey v. Chem-Ionics Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API