Legal Opinion

Hinz v. Lieser

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1958No. 34214PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal from a money judgment based upon plaintiff’s claim to a. real-estate .agent’s, cpmmission.

The primary question is whether defendants, as vendors, made certain representations regarding the acreage of an irregular tract of land involved in the transaction. The vendees (additional defendants and respondents) refused to complete the purchase, because they claimed the tract was approximately fifteen acres less than the represented acreage. Upon conflicting evidence, the trial court resolved the issue against defendants.

Defendants challenged the sufficiency of the evidence at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. LeMaine v. SealsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. McKennon v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bremerton School District 100-C v. HibbardWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In Re the Guardianship of YoungkinWashington Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Wise v. FardenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Stringfellow v. StringfellowWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Nystrand v. O'MALLEYWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Tsubota v. George GunkelWashington Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API