Caffrey v. Chem-Ionics Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The present action is by a lawyer against a former client to recover compensation on a quantum meruit basis.
The lawyer had taken a case on a contingent fee and had commenced an action for his client to recover $5,182.06. We shall refer to that as the original action to distinguish it from the present action. Thereafter, the defendant, in the original action, answered and cross-complained for “roughly fifty thousand dollars.”
Differences between the lawyer and his client led to a severance of the lawyer-client relationship. A demand for answer to interrogatories, made by the defendant in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Hoke v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
- Dickson v. HausmanWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Fain v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Nystrand v. O'MALLEYWashington Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Colella v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Bain v. Clallam County Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Union Bank v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Mayo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against CaffreyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.