Legal Opinion

Caffrey v. Chem-Ionics Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1966No. 38281PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The present action is by a lawyer against a former client to recover compensation on a quantum meruit basis.

The lawyer had taken a case on a contingent fee and had commenced an action for his client to recover $5,182.06. We shall refer to that as the original action to distinguish it from the present action. Thereafter, the defendant, in the original action, answered and cross-complained for “roughly fifty thousand dollars.”

Differences between the lawyer and his client led to a severance of the lawyer-client relationship. A demand for answer to interrogatories, made by the defendant in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hoke v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Dickson v. HausmanWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Fain v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Nystrand v. O'MALLEYWashington Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Colella v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Bain v. Clallam County Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Union Bank v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  4. Mayo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against CaffreyWashington Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API