Legal Opinion

Birchler v. Castello Land Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1997No. 64548-5PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

— Castello Land Company (Castello) and J.R. Hayes & Sons, Inc. (Hayes) destroyed the trees and vegetation of various homeowners, and were found liable by the jury at trial for damages, which were trebled by the trial court pursuant to RCW 64.12.030. The jury also awarded emotional distress damages of $2,000 to each of the homeowners. Castello and Hayes now contend emotional distress damages cannot be recovered in a statutory action for injury to trees and shrubs because the plaintiffs must elect either statutory or common-law remedies. We hold emotional distress damages, if proved, may be…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cagle v. Burns and Roe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cherberg v. Peoples National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Nord v. Shoreline Savings Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Kloepfel v. BokorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Kloepfel v. BokorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Seminole Pipeline Co., MAPCO, Inc. v. Broad Leaf Partners, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Broughton Lumber Co. v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API