Legal Opinion

Gifford v. Horton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1909No. 7912PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered July 30, 1908, upon stipulated facts, upon an appeal from an award of the state board of land commissioners, in a contest over the preference right to purchase shore lands.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

The state, through its proper officers, platted the shore lands upon Lake Union, filed the plat in the office of the commissioner of public lands July 1, 1907, and offered the lands for sale according to law. The appellant, Horton, the respondent Gifford, the respondent Francies 11. Day in her own right, and the respondents Smith and Westby, as executors of the will and as devisees of the estate of B. F. Day, deceased, the first two acting severally and the last three acting jointly, claimed the preference right to purchase lots 23, 24, and 25, of block 96, Lake Union shore lands, as platted.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bissell v. . the New York Central R.R. CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ferry v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Mott v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Haberman v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Rowe v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. SturtevantWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Motoramp Garage Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Pacific Iron Works v. Bryant Lumber & Shingle Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API