Legal Opinion

Baker v. Monsanto Co.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided April 9, 1997No. IP 91-626-C-B/SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BARKER, Chief Judge.

This ease is presently before this court on Defendant Monsanto Company’s (“Monsanto”) motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’, Johnnie Taylor (Taylor) and Richard Sluder (Sluder), claims of tortious failure to warn and fraud. Defendant also moves for summary judgment on Sluder’s claim of battery. Sluder’s wife is also a party in this lawsuit; she asserts a loss of consortium claim, derivative of her husband’s claims against Monsanto. In response to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Donald C. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sheila Ritchie v. Glidden Company, Ici Paints World-Group and Graco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Bernier v. Simon-Telelect, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
  5. Ritchie, Sheila v. Glidden CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API