Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Hitchcock v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 1994No. 67847PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harper, Judge.
On September 7, 1994, Tim and Cherie Burich, former foster parents of Shampail Hitchcock, commenced the above-captioned prohibition action, seeking to prevent the Cuyahoga County Probate Court from holding the finalization hearing in Shampail’s adoption, scheduled for 10:30 a.m. on September 7, 1994. *603Sua sponte, for the following reasons, this court denies the emergency motion for writ of prohibition and dismisses the writ of prohibition.
The Buriches allege that they are white and that the Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services (“the County”) has certified…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In re Adoption of RidenourOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Gilligan v. HoddinottOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Connole v. Cleveland Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- John Weenink & Sons Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Judson v. SpahrOhio Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re HitchcockOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- B.C. v. Cullman County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
- State ex rel. Allen Cty. Children Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Probate Div. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Allen Cty. Children Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Probate Div. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016