Legal Opinion

In Re Hitchcock

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1996No. Nos. 69291 and 69292PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Spellacy, Chief Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal of appellate case Nos. 69291 and 69292. Tim and Cherie Burich (“appellants”) appeal from the order of the juvenile court terminating the Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services’ (“CCDCFS”) permanent custody of Shampail and Hastings Hitchcock and granting legal custody of the children to Mary and Abdul Abdullah.

Appellants assign the following errors for review:

“I. The trial court erred in allowing the Abdullahs to continue once they were legally ineligible to adopt.
“II. The trial court erred in failing to rule on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In re Jane Doe 1Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In re Baby Girl BaxterOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In re Adoption of RidenourOhio Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re J.F., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  2. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS v. Zander B & Kelly B. (Foster Parents)Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re M.L.R.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. In Re C.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API