State ex rel. Allen Cty. Children Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Probate Div. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 42} To achieve the result it desires in this case, the new majority reframes the question in such a way that it can be answered only in the affirmative: “The issue in this case is whether a probate court may exercise its exclusive jurisdiction over adoption proceedings while a juvenile court is concurrently exercising continuing jurisdiction over a child custody proceeding.” (Emphasis sic.) Majority opinion at ¶ 1.
{¶ 43} The actual question before us, however, is whether a probate court may exercise its exclusive jurisdiction over adoption proceedings while a juvenile court is exercising…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lehman Ex Rel. Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Services AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.