State ex rel. Judson v. Spahr
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In order for the extraordinary writ of prohibition to issue this court must find that the court or officer against whom it is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, that the exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law, and that relator has no other adequate remedy at law. State, ex rel. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth., v. Guzzo (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 270, 6 OBR 335, 452 N.E. 2d 1314; State, ex rel. Northern Ohio Tel. Co., v. Winter (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 6, 52 O.O. 2d 29, 260 N.E. 2d 827.
The first requirement is clearly satisfied in this case. The Licking…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. Phillips v. PolcarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- John Weenink & Sons Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- State ex rel. Smith v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Burris v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Tilford v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Sellers v. GerkenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.