Legal Opinion

Stanton v. City of Battle Creek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2002No. Docket 115909PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

This case calls into question whether a forklift is a “motor vehicle” within the ambit of the motor vehicle exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1405. We hold that it is not, and, therefore, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the trial court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants.

*613I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On April 28, 1995, plaintiff Michael Stanton1 was working as a track driver for Hover Tracking Company and delivered hardware to a site defendant city of Battle Creek owned. Defendant Allen M. Howard, a city employee, drove a forklift…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Monat v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Corley v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. Hawkins; People v. ScherfMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API