People v. Denio
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
In People v Denio, we are asked to construe the conspiracy statute, MCL 750.157a; MSA 28.354(1),1 as it relates to the consecutive sentencing provision of MCL 333.7401(3); MSA 14.15(7401)(3).2 The conspiracy statute mandates that a person con*695victed of conspiracy “shall be punished by a penalty equal to that which could be imposed if he had been convicted of committing the crime he conspired to commit . . . The consecutive sentencing provision of § 7401(3) mandates that prison terms for the enumerated drug offenses must run consecutively with sentences imposed for other felonies. The issue is…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- People v. KowalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. AnsteyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.