Cummings v. Dosam, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
A grantee, who accepts a deed containing otherwise valid covenants purporting to bind him, thereby becomes bound for the performance of such covenants. Realty Co. v. Hobbs, 261 N.C. 414, 135 S.E. 2d 30; Barrier v. Randolph, 260 N.C. 741, 133 S.E. 2d 655. Such a covenant restricting the use which the grantee may make of the land so conveyed to him is deemed a grant by him of a negative easement m such property. Ring v. Mayberry, 168 N.C. 563, 84 S.E. 846. See also: Callaham v. Arenson, 239 N.C. 619, 80 S.E. 2d 619; Craven County v. Trust Co., 237 N.C. 502, 75 S.E. 2d 620. It necessarily…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Callaham v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Hege v. SellersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Cleveland Realty Company v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- J. T. Hobby & Son, Inc. v. Family Homes of Wake County, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Runyon v. PaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Armstrong v. Ledges Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Stegall v. Housing Authority of the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Beech Mountain Property Owner's Ass'n v. SeifartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.