Reed v. Elmore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The question presented for decision is: Do the provisions of the deed from Mrs. Shannon to plaintiff impose mutual restrictive servitudes on the lands then conveyed to plaintiff and retained by Mrs. Shannon, or did the deed merely create mutual personal obligations?
The answer is to be found by ascertaining the intention of grantor and grantee when the sale and purchase was consummated. That must be done by interpreting the language which the parties chose to express that intention. Stephens Company v. Lisk, 240 N.C. 289, 82 S.E. 2d 99; Hine v. Blumenthal, 239 N.C. 537, 80 S.E. 2d 458; Spencer…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Trustees of Watertown v. Cowen & BaggNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Adams v. RowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Runyon v. PaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Stegall v. Housing Authority of the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Lamica v. GerdesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.