Legal Opinion

Rhinehart v. Leitch

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 28, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

Plaintiff and defendant own adjoining lands in a portion of the city of Stamford known as “Pinehurst,” a real-estate development which in all included about one hundred and seventy lots. Both acquired title from the Pinehurst Realty Corporation. That corporation had acquired the whole tract from the Morewood Realty Company under a deed containing certain restrictions. Among these is one which provides: “No part of the foundation of any building constructed on said lots shall be within twenty-five feet of the street line on which said lot fronts.” The deed to the defendant was expressly made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Easterbrook v. Hebrew Ladies Orphan SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. Howland v. AndrusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Adams v. HowellNew York Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ingle v. StubbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Barniak v. GrossmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Building Inspector v. McInerneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hickson v. Noroton Manor, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Aller v. Berkeley Hall School FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API